On June 4, 2026, Piermont’s Marthe Schulwolf of the
so-called “Piermont Democratic Committee” or “PDC”, engaged in a bigoted rant
about human beings who she objectified and summarily categorized as the “Ultra-Orthodox”.
With broad brush in hand, Marthe Schulwolf, a New York State governmental
public official running for re-election out of what was at least in part her own self-serving interest,
assured us that the “Ultra-Orthodox”[her words] “are… very authoritarian,
structured, cultish societies that do what the rabbis tell them to do”, and
who “don’t believe in gender or racial equality”. [Emphasis supplied].
Marthe Schulwolf, Piermont’s desiccated answer to Archie Bunker, continued her rant by informing all of us, in that June 4, 2026 public forum, that the “Ultra-Orthodox”[her words] “did get one of their people to become the Democratic Commissioner of Elections. Hopefully she’s following the law. She is the daughter of the… Ramapo Chair… who is an ultra-Orthodox… Severe problem.” [Emphasis added]:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/full-pdc-transcript-thursday-june-4.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/request-for-new-york-state-attorney.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Eya_AhJads
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/vote-sexist-vote-bigot-vote-liar-vote.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/gee-our-old-lasalle-ran-great.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/mount-wolfmore.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/piermont-june-19-primary-defeat-marthe.html
Yet the “severe problem” is that Marthe Schulwolf’s unabashed bigotry has infected the Village of Piermont, has infected Piermont’s so-called “Democratic Committee”, and has now infected the rank-and-file of at least a few hundred of Piermont’s residents. After all, the other severe problem is that on June 4, 2026, Marthe Schulwolf spouted off these hateful comments to a roomful of Piermont public officials, politicians, and residents – and not one of those individuals in that Piermont room contemporaneously sought to stop Schulwolf or even vocally object to Schulwolf’s intolerant and incendiary statements.
That’s right. It was a roomful of Piermont cowards.
Seeing that no local solution was availing as it should have been, Marthe Schulwolf’s misconduct as a public official was reported in writing to New York State Attorney General Letitia James and her staff:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/request-for-new-york-state-attorney.html
That state matter remains pending (the “State Complaint”).
Marthe Schulwolf’s misconduct as a public official was then reported in writing to Acting Attorney General of the United States Todd Blanche and his colleagues, as a federal matter (“Federal Complaint”):
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/piermont-candidate-schulwolf-makes-new.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/piermonts-marthe-schulwolf-finds.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/piermonts-marthe-schulwolf-meets-justice.html
Then and thereafter, a few interesting things happened.
On June 23, 2026, no less than 192 Piermont residents voted to re-elect Marthe Schulwolf to the Piermont Democratic Committee or “PDC” – the vast majority already having heard, or at least heard about, Schulwolf’s deplorable June 4, 2026 Marge Schott act:
Marthe Schulwolf, Piermont’s desiccated answer to Archie Bunker, continued her rant by informing all of us, in that June 4, 2026 public forum, that the “Ultra-Orthodox”[her words] “did get one of their people to become the Democratic Commissioner of Elections. Hopefully she’s following the law. She is the daughter of the… Ramapo Chair… who is an ultra-Orthodox… Severe problem.” [Emphasis added]:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/full-pdc-transcript-thursday-june-4.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/request-for-new-york-state-attorney.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Eya_AhJads
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/vote-sexist-vote-bigot-vote-liar-vote.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/gee-our-old-lasalle-ran-great.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/mount-wolfmore.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/piermont-june-19-primary-defeat-marthe.html
Yet the “severe problem” is that Marthe Schulwolf’s unabashed bigotry has infected the Village of Piermont, has infected Piermont’s so-called “Democratic Committee”, and has now infected the rank-and-file of at least a few hundred of Piermont’s residents. After all, the other severe problem is that on June 4, 2026, Marthe Schulwolf spouted off these hateful comments to a roomful of Piermont public officials, politicians, and residents – and not one of those individuals in that Piermont room contemporaneously sought to stop Schulwolf or even vocally object to Schulwolf’s intolerant and incendiary statements.
That’s right. It was a roomful of Piermont cowards.
Seeing that no local solution was availing as it should have been, Marthe Schulwolf’s misconduct as a public official was reported in writing to New York State Attorney General Letitia James and her staff:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/request-for-new-york-state-attorney.html
That state matter remains pending (the “State Complaint”).
Marthe Schulwolf’s misconduct as a public official was then reported in writing to Acting Attorney General of the United States Todd Blanche and his colleagues, as a federal matter (“Federal Complaint”):
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/piermont-candidate-schulwolf-makes-new.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/piermonts-marthe-schulwolf-finds.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/piermonts-marthe-schulwolf-meets-justice.html
Then and thereafter, a few interesting things happened.
On June 23, 2026, no less than 192 Piermont residents voted to re-elect Marthe Schulwolf to the Piermont Democratic Committee or “PDC” – the vast majority already having heard, or at least heard about, Schulwolf’s deplorable June 4, 2026 Marge Schott act:
https://app.enhancedvoting.com/results/public/rockland-county-ny/elections/PE26
The conclusion is inescapable that those 192 Piermont residents must either share Marthe Schulwolf’s bigoted views about the “Ultra-Orthodox”[Schulwolf’s words] - or at least tolerate them like the unmeritable sheep that the 192 Piermont residents are.
The conclusion is inescapable that those 192 Piermont residents must either share Marthe Schulwolf’s bigoted views about the “Ultra-Orthodox”[Schulwolf’s words] - or at least tolerate them like the unmeritable sheep that the 192 Piermont residents are.
Around that same time, the following Blog post went inexplicably viral, garnering 10 to 20 times the normal number of digital “hits” that posts to this Blog usually tally:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/piermonts-marthe-schulwolf-meets-justice.html
This phenomenon normally would
only occur if a sub-section of the Rockland County community would seize upon
the post and then re-post it through other channels. That sub-section could
well have been one or more of the religious communities in western Rockland
County. Or, it could have been others who care about what the word “Democrat”
is really supposed to mean. Or, maybe both.
Then, this past Friday, the Administrative Section of the USDOJ Civil Rights Division declined to take further action on the Federal Complaint (Report Number 790245-ZBK), appearing to defer it to state or local authority. This would ostensibly include deference to the pending State Complaint to New York State Attorney General Letitia James and her staff:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/initial-reluctance-from-administrative.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/request-for-new-york-state-attorney.html
But wait. There’s more.
Yesterday, Monday, the Criminal Section of the USDOJ Civil Rights Division assigned a different Report Number to the Federal Complaint (795562-ZDV), and appears to now be considering further action on the federal complaint. To quote the Criminal Section, “Please know that the information you have provided will receive appropriate consideration”.
So here are some possible reasons why this positive, cavalry-over-the-hill development happened:
1. The USDOJ Administrative Section and the USDOJ Criminal Section each separately received electronic and/or mailed copies of the same complaint, and each responded separately.
2. The USDOJ Administrative Section and the USDOJ Criminal Section may well have separate authority and the ability to make separate determinations. They may act independently.
3. Alternatively, perhaps the USDOJ Administrative Section and the USDOJ Criminal Section are normally expected to concur, and this was simply a case where the two sections were not able to communicate with each other prior to responding to what was essentially the same complaint notified to multiple USDOJ destinations.
4. Alternatively, perhaps the USDOJ Criminal Section is expressly overruling the USDOJ Administrative Section’s Friday determination, after reviewing it and realizing that it really should not be dismissed. Being that USDOJ carefully logs-in every incoming complaint and uses software to do so, this explanation appears to be the most likely - especially when one considers the federal ramifications of Schulwolf's bigoted comments as a public official.
5. There is also the possibility that the extensive readership of the Friday, June 19, 2026 Blog post resulted in members of one or more of the religious communities in western Rockland County, or perhaps others, to separately contact the United States Department of Justice and request or demand agency response to Marthe Schulwolf’s vile, bigoted comments as a public official:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/piermonts-marthe-schulwolf-meets-justice.html
In any event, we’re back on. Eyes are on Marthe Schulwolf.
As for the 192 Marthe Schulwolf sycophants in Piermont - and as for the roomful of Piermont-resident cowards and PDC-enablers who in-person heard and witnessed Marthe Schulwolf’s bigoted rant on June 4, 2026 and did absolutely nothing to stop her – they are as much the “severe problem” as Marthe Schulwolf herself. For that matter, they may find themselves in their own brush with Justice.
Then, this past Friday, the Administrative Section of the USDOJ Civil Rights Division declined to take further action on the Federal Complaint (Report Number 790245-ZBK), appearing to defer it to state or local authority. This would ostensibly include deference to the pending State Complaint to New York State Attorney General Letitia James and her staff:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/initial-reluctance-from-administrative.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/request-for-new-york-state-attorney.html
But wait. There’s more.
Yesterday, Monday, the Criminal Section of the USDOJ Civil Rights Division assigned a different Report Number to the Federal Complaint (795562-ZDV), and appears to now be considering further action on the federal complaint. To quote the Criminal Section, “Please know that the information you have provided will receive appropriate consideration”.
So here are some possible reasons why this positive, cavalry-over-the-hill development happened:
1. The USDOJ Administrative Section and the USDOJ Criminal Section each separately received electronic and/or mailed copies of the same complaint, and each responded separately.
2. The USDOJ Administrative Section and the USDOJ Criminal Section may well have separate authority and the ability to make separate determinations. They may act independently.
3. Alternatively, perhaps the USDOJ Administrative Section and the USDOJ Criminal Section are normally expected to concur, and this was simply a case where the two sections were not able to communicate with each other prior to responding to what was essentially the same complaint notified to multiple USDOJ destinations.
4. Alternatively, perhaps the USDOJ Criminal Section is expressly overruling the USDOJ Administrative Section’s Friday determination, after reviewing it and realizing that it really should not be dismissed. Being that USDOJ carefully logs-in every incoming complaint and uses software to do so, this explanation appears to be the most likely - especially when one considers the federal ramifications of Schulwolf's bigoted comments as a public official.
5. There is also the possibility that the extensive readership of the Friday, June 19, 2026 Blog post resulted in members of one or more of the religious communities in western Rockland County, or perhaps others, to separately contact the United States Department of Justice and request or demand agency response to Marthe Schulwolf’s vile, bigoted comments as a public official:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2026/06/piermonts-marthe-schulwolf-meets-justice.html
In any event, we’re back on. Eyes are on Marthe Schulwolf.
As for the 192 Marthe Schulwolf sycophants in Piermont - and as for the roomful of Piermont-resident cowards and PDC-enablers who in-person heard and witnessed Marthe Schulwolf’s bigoted rant on June 4, 2026 and did absolutely nothing to stop her – they are as much the “severe problem” as Marthe Schulwolf herself. For that matter, they may find themselves in their own brush with Justice.
