Saturday, August 10, 2024

Takin' It To The Street.

 

 
To: All Municipal Bond Professionals – Wall Street, And Elsewhere
From: John J. Tormey III, Esq.
Date: Saturday, August 10, 2024
Re: Village of Piermont, New York Municipal Bonds - Currently Rated By Standard & Poor’s.
 
Distribution:
futurenow@futurenet.com (Moneyweek)                            
info@troweprice.com (T. Rowe Price)
MarketSupervision-US@ice.com (Intercontinental Exchange)    
michael.scarchilli@arizent.com (The Bond Buyer/Arizent)
MSRBSupport@msrb.org (Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board/MSRB)
mutualfunds@usnews.com (US News and World Report)
press@dotdash.com (Investopedia)
research@sifma.org (Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association/SIFMA)
support@barrons.com (Barron’s)
by web-form and mail: (Fidelity Investments)
by web-form and mail: (JP Morgan Private Bank)
by web-form and mail: (Merrill Lynch Wealth Management)
by web-form and mail: (municipalbonds.com)
 
I am a New York attorney residing in the Town of Orangetown and the County of Rockland. I write as a concerned citizen - and as a known adversary to the Village of Piermont, New York, its current Mayor Bruce Tucker, and their egregious environmental practices.
 
The Village of Piermont is also located within the Town of Orangetown, New York. Piermont used to be the most beautiful and picturesque of all the Hudson River communities in my view. Through use of a studiously-opaque village government, though, Piermont Mayor Bruce Tucker and the Village of Piermont government are now in the process of trying to sell-out the village to shady real estate developers threatening taxpaying residents with serious environmental harm, when Tucker and the rest of Village Hall really should be working to remediate the constant flooding in Piermont instead. Some Piermont residents have even taken to re-building on stilts because of the flooding.
 
My request is that bondholders and their representatives and affiliates please carefully re-examine and re-analyze any current bond rating upon which they may be relying in connection with Piermont, New York – and also consider the within information in connection with future bond purchase decisions. I base this request upon the following specific reasons, with citations:
 
Reason #1: Mayor Bruce Tucker and the Village of Piermont, New York just announced a drastic six-point-nine percent (6.9%) tax increase after first voting to exceed the otherwise-applicable tax cap. See “Incorporated Village or Piermont, Board of Trustees Meeting”, April 16, 2024 Minutes, at:
https://cms9files1.revize.com/piermont/document_center/Agendas%20&%20Minutes/2024/Minutes/BOT%20Meeting%20Minutes%20April%2016%202024.pdf
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2024/08/watch-as-mayor-bruce-tucker-blows-away.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2024/08/piermont-do-you-speak-succubus.html
 
Reason #2: Since Year 2017, Piermont Mayor Bruce Tucker has put the Village of Piermont into a negative Net Position of US$7,600,000+ into the hole - from an original US$800,000 surplus. Tucker has purposefully redistributed the wealth of unsuspecting village residents into crushing and overstuffed long-term pension and other obligations, thereby mortgaging the collective futures of future generations of Piermont residents:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2024/07/he-spent-it.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2024/08/piermont-do-you-speak-succubus.html
 
Reason #3: In a recent July 30, 2024 “interview” with well-known local planted propaganda publication the Rockland County Business Journal (RCBJ), Piermont Mayor Bruce Tucker nevertheless admitted to Piermont’s current financial distress for which he obviously did not adequately plan:
 
“‘[E]verything hit at once’, the mayor said. ‘We’re dealing with sticker shock on insurances, inflation, [sic] huge retirement mandates by New York State’.”
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2024/08/piermont-do-you-speak-succubus.html
https://rcbizjournal.com/2024/07/30/piermont-mayor-bruce-tucker-talks-about-controversy-engulfing-his-village/
 
Reason #4: When questioned if he would use a portion of a puzzling US$3,210,196 “unassigned Fund Balance” (presumably) to offset the new and imminent tax hit to Piermont taxpaying residents, Mayor Tucker replied that he would only be using US$216,000 of that Fund Balance because, in his words:
 
“Bond counsel recommends not to take from the fund balance because it will affect the Village’s credit rating. [Emphasis supplied]. The credit rating decides the rate of interest the Village will pay on Bond (Capital) items. Currently the Villages[sic] S&P rating is AA+.”
 
See “Incorporated Village or Piermont, Board of Trustees Meeting”, April 16, 2024 Minutes, at:
https://cms9files1.revize.com/piermont/document_center/Agendas%20&%20Minutes/2024/Minutes/BOT%20Meeting%20Minutes%20April%2016%202024.pdf
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2024/08/watch-as-mayor-bruce-tucker-blows-away.html
 
Aside from the fact that Mayor Tucker thereby waived the privilege of confidential attorney-client communications when he was unwise and ill-advised enough to read the advice of “Bond Counsel” into the public record - Mayor Tucker’s own admission of his intentional manipulation of taxpayer funds to make the bond landscape appear rosier than it actually is, should be called out and acknowledged as deception by a public official. I ask that you please review the full text of the above-linked April 16, 2024 Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes for a full review of Mayor Tucker’s unabashed artifice in this regard.
 
Reason #5: Piermont Village Hall made a recent “decision” to finally release and upload to the Village of Piermont website, the multiple years’ worth of Village financial statements which Village Hall had previously sought to conceal from Piermont residents since Year 2020:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2024/07/tell-it-to-tom.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2024/07/pay-no-attention-to-garmento-behind_13.html
https://www.piermont-ny.gov/government/clerks_office/financial_audits.php#outer-452
 
Reason #6: In similar vein, Piermont Village Hall purposefully failed to timely file its financial information with the Office of the New York State Comptroller (OSC), thereby preventing anyone from ever seeing Piermont’s “Fiscal Score”, “Environmental Score”, and “Health Designation” for Fiscal Year 2023 in the “Fiscal Stress Monitoring System” within the Comptroller’s website:
https://wwe1.osc.state.ny.us/localgov/fiscalmonitoring/fsms.cfm
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2024/07/that-time-when-bruce-tucker-sandbagged.html
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2024/07/crouching-tiger-hidden-garmento.html
 
This apparently has become an unfortunately familiar tactic by other financially distressed municipalities in Rockland County, New York.
 
In summary, it is my belief that, at minimum, the innocent bondholders and their representatives and affiliates who have relied upon any prior Piermont bond rating, will want to examine and review the Piermont Village Hall shenanigans that Piermont residents have suffered through during the six-and-one-half years of Bruce Tucker’s malignant mayoral reign. The time to do that is now, before Piermont Mayor Bruce Tucker tries to raise their taxes again, or sells-out the Village to another irresponsible real estate developer again. Come to think of it, it would also be a good idea to re-evaluate any Piermont municipal bond purchase decisions before the next unfortunate flood.
 
Very truly yours,
 
John J. Tormey III, Esq.
Resident of the Town of Orangetown, New York