Saturday, November 30, 2024

Rockland County To Piermont Mayor Bruce Tucker: "You Haven't The Faintest Idea What You Are Doing, Do You?"


DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
Dr. Robert L. Yeager Health Center
50 Sanatorium Road, Building T
Pomona, New York 10970
Phone: (845) 364-3434          
Fax: (845) 364-3435
           
Douglas J. Schuetz                           
Acting Commissioner
 
Richard M. Schiafo             
Deputy Commissioner
 
November 18, 2024
                                   
Piermont Village Board
478 Piermont Avenue
Piermont, NY 10968                          
 
Tax Data: 75.55-1-19, 75.63-1-1, 75.55-1-20, 75.63-1-64, 75.54-2-27, 75.55-1-14.2, 75.54-2-11, 75.54-2-29, 75.54-2-13, 75.54-2-10, 75.54-2-17.3, 75.55-1-18, 75.54-2-36, 75.54-2-31, 75.54-2-33, 75.54-2-40.1, 75.54-2-8, 75.55-1-13, 75.54-2-35, 75.54-2-37, 75.55-1-17, 75.54-2-15, 75.55-1-21, 75.54-2-16, 75.54-2-38, 75.54-2-14, 75.54-2-26, 75.54-2-24, 75.54-2-39, 75.54-2-40.2, 75.54-2-25, 75.54-2-12, 75.54-2-17.1, 75.54-2-9, 75.54-2-32, 75.55-1-15, 75.54-2-17.2, 75.54-2-30, 75.54-2-23, 75.55-1-14.1, 75.54-2-28, 75.55-1-16, 75.54-2-22, 75.54-2-34
 
Re: GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW REVIEW: Section 239 L and M
 
Map Date:
Date Review Received: 10/25/2024
Item: Central Business Mixed-Use (CBM) District (GML-24-0291)
 
A zoning map and text amendment to create a new Central Multi-Use Business (CBM) zoning district in place of a majority of the existing Business B (BB) District that will be more closely aligned with existing built conditions and uses in what is widely considered to be the Village's downtown. The proposed law also includes a provision to impose a limit of one dwelling unit per 1,250 square feet of lot area for dwellings over commercial uses within the BB zoning district.
 
Along Piermont Avenue, roughly bounded by Kinney Street and Tate Avenue for the proposed CBM zoning district and throughout the BB zoning district.
 
Reason for Referral:
County Route 8 - Main St, Sparkill Creek, Ash Street Station Park, Long Path Trail, State Route 304, US Route 202 & 9W, Tallman Mountain State Park, Orangetown
 
The County of Rockland Department of Planning has reviewed the above item. Acting under the terms of the above GML powers and those vested by the County of Rockland Charter, I, the Commissioner of Planning, hereby:
 
Recommend the Following Modifications
 
1. The local law must be amended to update the Village's Table of General Bulk Regulations and Table of General Use Regulations for the proposed CBM District.
 
2. The Village may want to consider creating individual bulk requirements for studios/professional offices, as the pre-existing BB district had different bulk requirements for those uses and the proposed zone will be replacing most of the BB district.
 
3. Section 210-61.2(B)(1) provides some specifications for architectural appearance of multiple dwellings. This department recommends that language be added to this section that requires review by the Piermont Architectural Review Commission. The Village should also consider amending section 4-4.C of the Village Code, which governs the jurisdiction of the Commission, to include applications within the proposed CBM zoning district.
 
4. Sections 210-61.1 through Section 210-61.6 of the proposed law reference the CB district. This should be changed to CBM, so that all references within the proposed law are consistent.
 
5. The EAF submitted with the application calls the new zoning district "Central Business-Multifamily" while the draft law calls the zone "Central Business Multi-Use District." This must be corrected. All application materials must be consistent.
 
6. It is recommended that the local law specifically identify the individual parcels that will be changed from the BB district to the CBM district. Although Section 3 of the proposed law provides street boundaries of the new zone, providing the parcel numbers will provide clarity and a more descriptive depiction of the new zone.
 
7. Based on the map provided on page 3 of the Local Law, it appears that parcels 75.54-2-22, 23, & 24 are to be included in the CBM zoning district. However, these parcels do not meet the provisions described in the same section. This must be clarified. All application materials must be consistent.
 
8. The GML referral form sent with this application describes this law as a "Zoning Text Amendment". It should be corrected to "Zoning Text and Map Amendment". The EAF refers to this law as "Adoption of Text Amendments to the Zoning Local Law of the Village of Piermont". All application materials must refer to this proposed law as both a text and map amendment.
 
9. Section 3 (4), of the proposed law states that lot 75.55-1-14.3 will become part of the CBM district. This department does not have any record of such a lot being created nor can we find any record in the Town of Orangetown tax mapping or assessment systems for a such lot. Once a subdivision has been approved, a filed map cannot be used to convey property, nor can the tax maps be updated with the lot changes, until the deeds are filed with the County Clerk, conveying the portions of the lots that are required to achieve the lot configuration indicated on the subdivision map. The applicant and the Village must make sure that the deeds are properly filed with the Rockland County Clerk to ensure that the tax maps are properly updated.
 
A previous GML referral received by this department on November 16, 2023, proposed a subdivision of lot 75.55-1-1.1 to create lot 75.55-1-14.3 as part of an application to construct a new 3 level, 14 unit multiple dwelling development in the CBM zoning district. This department issued a disapproval letter of this application on December 11, 2023, indicating that the local law that created the CBM zoning was invalid as a matter of law, as this department had not had the opportunity under GML Section 239 to review the proposed law. The court has since found the Village of Piermont Local Law No. 4 of 2023 to be null, void, and jurisdictionally defective (October 11, 2024). Prior to adopting this proposed law, it would appear a subdivision application would need to be submitted, or Lot 75.55-1-14.3 removed from the proposed law. Under GML Section 239-n, a subdivision application must be submitted to this department for review.
 
10. Section 210-68.1.B of the proposed local allows certain uses to satisfy off-street parking requirements through the leasing or renting of off-site spaces, subject to certain conditions. Subsection (1) states that off-site spaces "must either be within the Business B Zoning District or Central Business Multi-Use Districts or (if not in Business B or Central Multi-Use) be within 250 feet of the food/beverage service establishment lessee's business." This subsection does not include a maximum distance that would be applicable to leased or rented spaces within either the BB or CBM districts. This provision could be interpreted to allow the leasing of spaces located anywhere in the BB or CBM districts to any food/beverage service establishment that is also within the BB or CBM district. The distance between the northern end of the proposed CBM district and the existing BB districts along the southwestern boundary of the Village is approximately 0.9 miles. The Village should consider amending this section to include a maximum distance between the establishment and the leased or rented spaces that would be applicable in all circumstances.
 
11. The online posting by General Code of the Village's zoning regulations continues to show this law as already adopted and added on March 8, 2024 by Local Law No. 4-2023. The Village should contact General Code to either remove this section or, should it approve the proposed local law, update the posting with the correct date and law number.
 
12. Pursuant to New York State General Municipal Law (GML) Sections 239-m and 239-n, if any of the conditions of this GML review are overridden by the board, then the local land use board must file a report with the County’s Commissioner of Planning of the final action taken. If the final action is contrary to the recommendation of the Commissioner, the local land use board must state the reasons for such action.
 
 
Douglas J. Schuetz
Acting Commissioner of Planning
 
cc:  Mayor Bruce E. Tucker, Piermont
New York - New Jersey Trail Conference NYS Department of State
NYS Department of Transportation Rockland County Department of Health
Rockland County Div of Environmental Resources Rockland County Drainage Agency
Rockland County OFES Rockland County Planning Board Piermont Fire District
 
*New York State General Municipal Law § 239(5) requires a vote of a 'majority plus one' of your agency to act contrary to the above findings.
 
The review undertaken by the County of Rockland Department of Planning is pursuant to and follows the mandates of Article 12-B of the New York General Municipal Law. Under Article 12-B the County of Rockland does not render opinions nor determines whether the proposed action reviewed implicates the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. The County of Rockland Department of Planning defers to the municipality referring the proposed action to render such opinions and make such determinations as appropriate under the circumstances.
 
In this respect, municipalities are advised that under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, the preemptive force of any provision of the Act may be avoided (1) by changing a policy or practice that may result in a substantial burden on religious exercise, (2) by retaining a policy or practice and exempting the substantially burdened religious exercise, (3) by providing exemptions from a policy or practice for applications that substantially burden religious exercise, or (4) by any other means that eliminates the substantial burden.
 
Pursuant to New York State General Municipal Law §§ 239-m and 239-n, the referring body shall file a report of its final action with the County of Rockland Department of Planning within thirty (30) days after the final action. A referring body that acts contrary to a recommendation of modification or disapproval of a proposed action shall set forth the reasons for the contrary action in such report.