Weaksauce.

Kicking off his Piermont mayoral campaign with a lovely Rockwellian exegesis on the topic of “crick shoes”:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2025/09/exclusive-piermont-fireman-and-mayoral.html
 … then followed by a pusillanimous mailing wherein Mitchell took on everything but the toughest specific issues facing Piermont:

... I challenged Mitchell to 29 questions in response, the answers to which are actually important for Piermont’s future:
https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2025/09/nate-mitchells-milquetoast-mailing.html

Nate Mitchell gently answered some of these questions with this below social media post because he knew that he had to:

However, in the words of Bob Welch, “It’s What ‘Ya Don’t Say”.
 
Nate Mitchell refuses to respond to Query #11 and Query #12.

Here is Query #11, posed to mayoral candidate Nate Mitchell:

And here is Query #12, posed to mayoral candidate Nate Mitchell:

Nate Mitchell was himself a member of the Piermont Fire Department when, as alleged, a 16-year-old volunteer was tied to a chair and sexually abused by three older firefighters on the Piermont Fire House front porch back on August 14, 2010, in a brutal hazing incident for which one of the firefighters pled guilty to N.Y. Penal Law § 240.20(7):

https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2025/09/unfinished-business-with-piermont.html

https://unhandpiermont.blogspot.com/2025/09/michael-bettman-pleads-guilty.html

Yet now, during election season, Nate Mitchell refuses to tell the Piermont public what if any measures he and the fire company took in response, to prevent violent sexual hazing of Piermont Fire Department recruits going forward. Moreover, Nate Mitchell refuses to tell the Piermont public what further measures he would take as Piermont Mayor to prevent future such instances of gross and unlawful misconduct.
 
This therefore raises the question. 

In the wake of the mayoral “reign” of disgraced Garmento Mayor Bruce Tucker, now thankfully a lame-duck and on his way out after being exposed as the failure that Tucker was - does Piermont now want a successor thereto who is strong, or alternatively, a new Mayor who is weaksauce?